US Asylum Officers Have Been Told To Quickly Process Immigrants Subject To Trump’s Ban

People cross the border between the US and Mexico in El Paso, Texas.

US asylum officers have been told to prioritize and quickly process cases of immigrants subject to a recent Trump administration policy banning asylum for people who crossed through Mexico, days before a pair of lawsuits over the policy are set to be heard in federal court.

According to an email sent Friday by John Lafferty, head of the asylum division at US Citizenship and Immigration Services, and obtained by BuzzFeed News, the directive appears to contradict statements made by US Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Mark Morgan. The CBP director told NPR on Thursday that the policy was a “pilot” that would be implemented in “just one location.”

Under the policy, those who crossed through Mexico to get to the southwest border will be denied asylum in the initial screening interview and be forced to apply for more limited protections that are difficult to obtain.

“It appears not only that they are applying the rule but applying it as quickly as possible,” said Sarah Pierce, an analyst at Migration Policy Institute, when told about the directive.

Ur Jaddou, a former chief counsel at USCIS, said the email was clearly an attempt to “maximize the effect of the rule, by prioritizing the group.”


On Friday, Lafferty told asylum officials they needed to keep track of the number of referrals for initial asylum screenings — called a credible fear interview — where immigrants must prove there is a significant possibility that they could establish they have a well-founded fear of persecution in their home country.

He told staffers they needed to review the referrals to see if the person came to the border on or after July 16, when the new policy took effect. Cases subject to a policy keeping immigrants in Mexico as they await processing of their asylum cases in the US took first priority, while those that fit the new asylum ban would be second priority.

Other cases, not impacted by either policy, would be the last priority.

Lafferty also told staffers the interviews needed to be done quickly: If asylum officers were referred cases Friday or before Friday, they needed to be completed no later than Sunday.

Morgan told NPR that officials expected the policy to be blocked in court.

“Morgan might have been wrong about the pilot, but he appears to be right on about the administration’s expectation that the new regulation will be quickly enjoined,” Pierce said, referring to the quick scheduling of cases.

In a statement to BuzzFeed News, Morgan said he was referring to a “focus of resources” in one area and not the implementation of the new policy.

“The [interim final rule] speaks to asylum eligibility and applies to all amenable individuals,” he said. “My statement referred to a focus of resources in the Rio Grande Valley region and not implementation of the interim rule as a whole.”

Lafferty told asylum staffers to also keep track of the processing and interviewing, ordering them to insert the data into an agency online case management system.

“The data reporting requests are coming fast and furious, so we need the cases put into GLOBAL as soon as possible and we need the cases interviewed and processed as quickly as possible,” he said in the email.

The administration has already made moves to speed up initial screenings of immigrants seeking asylum.

Asylum officers have had to wait at least 48 hours after an immigrant has been detained for crossing into the US to interview them and hear their case. However, under a new directive implemented by USCIS acting Director Ken Cuccinelli, that window has been reduced to one calendar day.

*see full story by Buzzfeed News