In Thursday’s ruling, Judge Amy Berman Jackson claimed the Immigration Reform Law Institute (IRLI), a conservative group representing U.S. citizen voters, lacked the necessary standing in order to challenge the controversial law. Jackson ruled that the plaintiffs did not show how they were harmed by the law allowing noncitizens to vote and hold public office in Washington, D.C.
{snip}
Fox News reported that the IRLI’s lawsuit challenged the “Local Resident Votings Rights Act,” which was passed in October 2022 by the D.C. Council. The law allows noncitizens to vote in local elections if they have lived in Washington, D.C., for at least 30 days. The law also allows noncitizen D.C. residents to serve on the city’s Board of Elections and run for local public office positions.
According to Fox News, the Local Resident Voting Rights Act has led to significant controversy and even resulted in an unsuccessful attempt by some federal lawmakers to overturn the law. In the recent lawsuit, the IRLI warned that the D.C. law “dilutes the vote of every U.S. citizen voter in the District” by allowing illegal immigrants and other noncitizens to vote.
The IRLI added, “Because it does so, the D.C. Noncitizen Voting Act is subject to review under both the equal protection and the substantive due process components of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.”
{snip}
In her ruling, Jackson wrote that the plaintiffs did not show how they “have personally been subjected to any sort of disadvantage as individual voters” due to the law allowing noncitizens to vote in Washington, D.C.
The judge added, “They may object as a matter of policy to the fact that immigrants get to vote at all, but their votes will not receive less weight or be treated differently than noncitizens’ votes; they are not losing representation in any legislative body; nor have citizens as a group been discriminatorily gerrymandered, ‘packed’ or ‘cracked’ to divide, concentrate, or devalue their votes.”
