Gabbard — who appointed a working group to declassify intelligence and curb spy agency abuses in April — chronicles in the new memo and underlying documents that President Barack Obama directed an Intelligence Community Assessment of Russian election interference tailor made for the press despite repeated findings by the intelligence community (IC) before the election that Russian authorities did not have such capabilities.
{snip}
A lawsuit has brought new scrutiny to the relentless reporting on the Russiagate saga by the Post and the New York Times. Trump sued the influential legacy journalists who comprise the Pulitzer Prize Board of Directors following a 2022 statement defending jointly awarding the 2018 prize to the Post and the Times, asserting that “no passages or headlines, contentions or assertions in any of the winning submissions were discredited by facts that emerged subsequent to the conferral of the prizes.”
Multiple IC reports — including a December 2016 Presidential Daily Briefing (PDB) drafted but scuttled just one day before Post reporting alleging intelligence pointed to Russian interference — concluded that Russia did not have the capabilities to interfere in the election.
{snip}
However the PDB was nixed after the FBI — under then-Director James Comey — withdrew its cooperation and began drafting a dissent. FBI and the Department of Justice Comey are reportedly investigating Comey for a criminal conspiracy related to the weaponized intelligence.
The next day, on Dec. 9, 2016, Obama convened a meeting in the White House Situation Room with Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, Central Intelligence Agency Director John Brennan and other national security officials on “Russian meddling,” declassified documents show.
The IC was tasked by Obama to put together two assessments: a classified version and a non-classified version to be made public.
{snip}
Requests for comment from the Post and reporters Ellen Nakashima, Adam Entous, Greg Miller did not receive an immediate response.
The Post responded in a statement defending Nakashima that “reaching out to potential sources rather than relying solely on official government press statements regarding matters of public interest is neither nefarious nor is it harassment. It is basic journalism.”
Please make a small donation to the Tampa Free Press to help sustain independent journalism. Your contribution enables us to continue delivering high-quality, local, and national news coverage.