FBI Analyst On Russia Hoax: ‘Our Instructions … Were To Push This’

“[T]he FBI senior analyst said that they were told by FBI leadership that all material, regardless of traditional sourcing standards, was to be made available in drafting the [Intelligence Community Assessment],” committee staff reported.

{snip}

As the staff report shows, the ICA omitted numerous pieces of intelligence that “challenged — and in some cases undermined” the ICA’s conclusion that Russian President Vladimir Putin wanted Trump to win the presidency. At the same time, CIA Director John Brennan did include unreliable, poorly-sourced intelligence to bolster the ICA’s flawed conclusions.

“Our instructions were that anything we had was to be used,” the unnamed senior FBI analyst told House investigators.

That guidance seems to have originated with President Obama himself. The HPSCI report found Brennan was acting in response to “direction from the President to make all information available.”

One of the several substandard sources included in the ICA was the Steele dossier, a collection of sensational claims about Donald Trump that was concocted by British spy Christopher Steele and commissioned by the Clinton campaign. The claims in the since-discredited Steele dossier were so ridiculous that senior CIA officials tried to keep it out of the ICA, according to the HPSCI report, but Brennan demanded it be included.

{snip}

Brennan also ordered the publication of three intelligence reports that would become “foundational” to the ICA’s flawed conclusions. He did so over the objection of veteran CIA personnel who said the reports “contained substandard information that was unclear, of uncertain origin, potentially biased, implausible, or in the words of senior operations officers, ‘odd.’”

{snip}

Investigators also noted the senior FBI analyst they interviewed “carefully chose” his words. The FBI “would not allow any other analysts to be interviewed” by congressional investigators, the report said.