A Massachusetts court ruled that the parents of an 11-year-old student had no right to know that their daughter changed her gender identity after the school kept it a secret from them.
Parents Stephen Foote and Marissa Silvestri said they had no idea their child switched to using male a name and wanted to be identified using gender-fluid pronouns at the school, located in Ludlow outside Springfield, because administrators ‘actively concealed’ it.
{snip}
School counselors responded by accepting the changes and allowing the student use any of its bathrooms – male, female or gender neutral. But in meetings with the parents, officials used the student’s female birth name and did not disclose the child’s new preference to be identified using a male name.
The federal suit alleged in 2022 that the Ludlow School Committee violated the parents’ constitutional rights by allowing administrators at Paul L. Baird Middle School to hide their daughter’s ‘genderqueer’ status.
They also accused the school of ‘usurping’ their role as parents to ‘direct the upbringing of their children’ by ‘concealing information related to their gender identity’.
{snip}
But the lawsuit was shot down last week when the US Court of Appeals agreed with a Massachusetts District Court’s earlier decision to dismiss the action.
During the 2020-’21 school year, the school’s librarian, Jordan Funke, asked sixth grade students to create biographic videos about themselves as part of a project.
Funke urged the students, including the 11-year-old at the center of the dispute, to include their pronouns in the video, according to the lawsuit.
In the months that followed, the 11-year-old student’s Google account on a school computer started showing ‘unsolicited LGBTQ-themed video suggestions,’ according to the suit.
{snip}
A short time later, the student announced in an email to school officials: ‘I am genderqueer.’ The pupil explained this meant they would go by any pronouns other than ‘it/its’ and also announced the name change.
The student said that if officials chose to ‘deadname’ the 11-year-old – which means to use their birth name – or ‘use any pronouns’ they were ‘not comfortable with,’ they would ‘politely tell’ them.
‘I am telling you this because I feel like I can trust you,’ the email said.
‘A list of pronouns you can use are: she/her he/him they/them fa/faerae/aer ve/ver xe/xem ze/zir.
‘I have added a link so you can look at how to say them. Please only use the ones I have listed and not the other ones. I do not like them. Thank you.’
{snip}
The student didn’t tell their parents about the identity changes, so school officials used the 11-year-old’s given name and she/her pronouns while speaking with them, but addressed the student by the new name during class.
School counselor Marie-Claire Foley also ‘privately’ told the student they could ‘use any bathroom that she preferred, including the boys’ bathroom, girls’ bathroom, or one of three gender neutral bathrooms at the school’, per the suit.
The parents became aware of the changes when their child confided in a teacher, Bonnie Manchester, about feeling depressed and having low self esteem, tied in with gender identity.
{snip}
The parents said they were ‘grateful’ the teacher contacted them, and they retained a private therapist for their child in December 2020.
They emailed staff at the school telling them they had gotten professional help for the child, requesting that staff not have private conversations with the student about it.
‘Please allow us to address this as a family and with the proper professionals,’ the parents wrote.
They accused the school of disregarding this, and therefore their parental rights, by ‘intentionally deceiving’ them about their child’s new name being used in school.
Within the Ludlow school district, teachers are instructed to not tell parents about a child’s expressions of gender without that student’s consent.
A lower federal district court ruled in favor of the school system, a decision which was confirmed by the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit on February 19.
‘Courts nationwide have faced all manner of important litigation involving matters of gender identity and gender expression, including use of folks’ preferred pronouns,’ the appeals court justices wrote. ‘Today’s case falls under that broad header.
{snip}
‘Parental rights are not unlimited,’ the judges added.
‘As per our understanding of Supreme Court precedent, our pluralistic society assigns those curricular and administrative decisions to the expertise of school officials, charged with the responsibility of educating children.’
The Ludlow school district said its policy is ‘appropriate and necessary to ensure a safe and inclusive school learning environment for students.’
* Original Article:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14430223/amp/court-decision-parents-daughter-gender-stephen-foote-marissa-silvestri.html?ito=smartnews